Di tempat saya juga hampir berimbang, pake isp bukan Te##Sp##dy
kalo latency bagusan Las Vegas
.
Las Vegas
Los Angeles
Kalo liat dari latency +1 buat Las Vegas
kalo latency bagusan Las Vegas
.
Las Vegas
.root@one:~# ping 23.92.53.77
PING 23.92.53.77 (23.92.53.77) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=205 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=205 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=209 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=209 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=204 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=207 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=207 ms
64 bytes from 23.92.53.77: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=211 ms
--- 23.92.53.77 ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9011ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 204.979/209.892/218.526/4.751 ms
Los Angeles
root@one:~# ping 192.227.243.143
PING 192.227.243.143 (192.227.243.143) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=212 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=210 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=215 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=212 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=5 ttl=52 time=212 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=6 ttl=52 time=211 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=7 ttl=52 time=211 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=8 ttl=52 time=212 ms
64 bytes from 192.227.243.143: icmp_seq=9 ttl=52 time=211 ms
--- 192.227.243.143 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 9 received, 0% packet loss, time 8009ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 210.493/212.107/215.005/1.332 ms
Kalo liat dari latency +1 buat Las Vegas